Marc Posted December 9, 2012 Report Share Posted December 9, 2012 I wasn't replying to you at that point Elyse, I was replying to Marc. That doesnt mean nobody else can comment Nicola Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparks Posted December 9, 2012 Report Share Posted December 9, 2012 No one can force someone to do something they don't want to do... Everyone knows the difference between what's right and wrong They chose to do it, therefore, they were in the wrong, I'm not saying they are Soley to blame, but they have to face the consequences of their actions. Sent from my GT-I9100 using Xparent Cyan Tapatalk 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Povodny Posted December 9, 2012 Report Share Posted December 9, 2012 That doesnt mean nobody else can comment Nicola That's clearly not what I meant Marc. Nor did I in anyway say or suggest no one else could comment. I was merely clarifying my response was to you not Elyse. I then as you can again clearly see responded to Elyse and her concerns, as it happens if you read our posts we both agree Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marc Posted December 9, 2012 Report Share Posted December 9, 2012 That's clearly not what I meant Marc. Nor did I in anyway say or suggest no one else could comment. I was merely clarifying my response was to you not Elyse. I then as you can again clearly see responded to Elyse and her concerns, as it happens if you read our posts we both agree I can read. It was also clear that Elyse was responding to your responce to me. Also it was clear that you were responding to me since you quoted me directly. Therefore there was no need for the comment. Hence why I commented myself. It was to point out a comment was not needed, as wasn't mine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Povodny Posted December 10, 2012 Report Share Posted December 10, 2012 I can read. It was also clear that Elyse was responding to your responce to me. Also it was clear that you were responding to me since you quoted me directly. Therefore there was no need for the comment. Hence why I commented myself. It was to point out a comment was not needed, as wasn't mine. Could you repeat that in English please lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarah Posted December 10, 2012 Author Report Share Posted December 10, 2012 Ok am confused lol Back on topic, the media has said they want to talk to the public but they're not sure how to go about it, you bay almost guarantee they will be given a script Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marc Posted December 10, 2012 Report Share Posted December 10, 2012 Could you repeat that in English please lol I cant. Ive read it twice, I wrote it and Im still not sure I understand it LOL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunc Posted December 10, 2012 Report Share Posted December 10, 2012 I can read. It was also clear that Elyse was responding to your responce to me. Also it was clear that you were responding to me since you quoted me directly. Therefore there was no need for the comment. Hence why I commented myself. It was to point out a comment was not needed, as wasn't mine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stranger Posted December 10, 2012 Report Share Posted December 10, 2012 mi not one for radio to be honest, i cant stand all the "games" and call in's that every radio station does, the silly conversations they have. I also dont like pranked TV shows. I think there are certain pranks that should not be carried out. its quite simple, a nurse, doctor etc is not permitted to give out patient information, full stop. the nurse should not of said anything, but then when someone phones up, i am not sure what the rules are, if you needed to be present to get information then the hospitals would always be full of concerned families. But the radio presenters, should of known that if they did get through to someone and they was able to get information out of them that this would mean a possible job loss, or that person getting into lots of trouble. If that nurse wanted to be in the public eye she would of gone to the newspapers and told her "story" but she didnt. she was just at work doing her job, and the next thing she knows she has TV, radio, newspapers chasing her down. Ive never been in the public eye, and even though it was just a short moment, the amount of presure and un wanted attention must of been over welming. people who are in the public eye by choice even break so those who arent in it by choice, i feel sorry for. If pranks are going to be carried out, they shouldnt be done live, giving the people carrying out the prank time to assess who is at risk if this blows up!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.