Jump to content

I'm Very Upset By New Dog Law


jim_tinmois

Recommended Posts

It appears that the dangerous dogs act will now extend to private property.  Whereas  I can see why it has been brought in, I cannot help but think that this is also a charter for intruders to take legal action should they be bitten in the course of committing a robbery.

Has anybody read the amendments fully ?   Are there any conditions under which an owner would not be liable ?   I know there are certain provisions in the original Act - for instance, If a person was to attack a dog  with a stick or similar object, then the owner is not liable if the dog bites.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i believe if you enter a property and get bit its ur own fault simple and easy !

 

No, unfortunately, that's not how the law works.   However, there does seem to be some provision here .  An intruder could always argue that he had been invited in etc, etc.

That's how clever Lawyers get the scum off and the decent people prosecuted

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy , along with dressing your husky as a unicorn on the first Thursday of each month